Evolution producing more attractive women: study

by Jennifer McWhirter on July 29, 2009

A study authored by Dr. Markus Jokela at the University of Helsinki, Department of Psychology, suggests that women are gradually becoming more and more good-looking.

This, the researchers explain, is because attractive women tend to have more children than their less-attractive coutnerparts, and a higher percentage of those children are girls. These girls grow up to be attractive women who have their own children and thus repeat the pattern. Generations of this has reportedly led to women gradually becoming more attractive. Read The Times for a great overview of the study.

Academic Citation:

Jokela, M. (in press, 2009) Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: evidence from the later 20th century United States. Evolution and Human Behaviour.

{ 0 comments }

Tanning Beds Top-Tier Cancer Risk

by Jennifer McWhirter on July 29, 2009

Skin cancer isn’t pretty. In fact, it can be deadly.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer has put tanning beds in the category of highest cancer risk. The Star reported today that tanning beds are “as deadly as mustard gas, arsenic, plutonium and other known carcinogens.”

I know some of you might be tempted by that (un)healthy glow tanning beds can offer, but I hope you agree that it is not worth the long-term risk to your health. And lets not forget the extra wrinkles you’ll be battling even if you are fortunate enough to avoid cancer. Instead, try a self-tanner or embrace your natural skin tone.

For more information about skin cancer and how to prevent it, read what Health Canada has to say.

{ 0 comments }

Beautiful and Fashionable Quotes: Karl Lagerfeld

by Jennifer McWhirter on May 21, 2009

“I don’t like standard beauty — there is no beauty without strangeness.” — Karl Lagerfeld

{ 0 comments }

The Changing Face of Stepmotherhood

by Jennifer McWhirter on May 7, 2009

Ugly and wicked. These are the words that come to mind when one thinks of the way stepmothers are historically portrayed in children’s stories and movies. Mother’s Day is around the corner and the lack of stepmother cards available has got me feeling a little uneasy.

Perhaps, most famous of all for depicting the ugly and wicked stereotype, is Cinderella’s stepmother. She, and her equally evil and ugly daughters, go to great lengths to prevent Cinderella from having the life and love she desires and deserves. 

Snow White’s stepmother, the Queen, tries to kill her. The Queen is definitely wicked, but she is an interesting case, because she is, arguably, also beautiful. She is well aware of her beauty, and portrayed as so vain that she is willing to kill Snow White to be the “fairest of them all.” If a stepmother is beautiful this seems to make her even more evil.

Hansel and Gretel’s stepmother, an ugly witch, lures her stepchildren into the woods to a house made of candy. She subsequently tries to bake Hansel and Gretel in the oven. Instead, Hansel and Gretel succeed in killing her and subsequently live “happily ever after.”

Enter, Gisele.

The May 2009 issue of Vanity Fair features supermodel Gisele Bundchen on the cover. If you don’t know her love story by now, it goes something like this: Supermodel meets football star quarterback (Tom Brady). Supermodel and football player fall in love. Two months in, football player learns his ex-girlfriend is pregnant and he is the father. Baby is born. Supermodel and football player get married. They all live happily ever after.

“I think it was a blessing, because otherwise I don’t think I would have known what he was made of, and he wouldn’t have known what I was made of,” says Gisele of finding out Brady’s ex-girlfriend was pregnant with his son. “Our relationship has become so much stronger, and I think I wouldn’t be as certain as I am today if it weren’t for that.”

And as far as her feelings towards her stepson are concerned: “I feel blessed to have him in my life.”

Gisele isn’t ugly, nor wicked, nor jealous. She’s beautiful, optimistic, open-minded, and big-hearted. She sheds stepmother stereotypes as effortlessly as she sheds her dress on the cover.

Whether she realizes it or not, Gisele might be helping to change the face of stepmotherhood.

{ 3 comments }

“There is no cosmetic for beauty like happiness.” - Marguerite Gardiner Blessington

{ 0 comments }

Model-turned-Nothing

by Jennifer McWhirter on May 1, 2009

I have decided to “retire” from modelling.

Modelling was something I had wanted to do for a very long time. I first began in the industry at 14, but for various reasons, left soon after that. I tried to return while I was a full-time university student, but geography and the amount of time and effort I put into my studies interfered. After university, I figured it was my chance. It was a late start, sure, but it enabled me to give this particular goal of mine 100% and see where it would take me.

To be frank, it didn’t take me where I wanted it to and it didn’t take me as far as I had hoped. Not everything can work out the way you want it to. But I’m still extremely glad that I gave it a good shot. I’m very fortunate to have been able to do so.

When I was in Paris earlier this year, someone outside of the modelling industry asked, out of curiosity and politeness in expressing interest in what I do, “So what are you hoping to gain from modelling? Why do you model?” I felt uncomfortable, embarrassed even, but gave a quick, polite answer mentioning the “usual” reasons people get into modelling - a chance to travel, earn money, and because it is an interest of mine.

But later, I reflected on his questions and my discomfort and answers for a long time. I realized that I was no longer sure of what I was hoping to gain from modelling and that I no longer had valid reasons for doing it. With my work experience and education, I could be earning better, more steady money, and easily pay for my own travel, so those reasons were no longer valid. And the chance of me becoming a highly successful, big earner in the industry was slim to none, given the age I was beginning at, among other things.

And as far as my motivations for being in the industry go, those have been the hardest to discover and accept. Initially, I loved the industry because I felt like I fit it. As is common for many models, I felt awkward in my tall, lanky body. But when I was around other models, I felt normal, average even. As a teenager, this sense of belonging and fitting in was intoxicating. I also felt insecure about my looks. If I can be a model, I thought, and models are held in high regard for their appearance, than my appearance must be attractive, too. I’m reminded of one answer an anonymous model wrote in a survey when I was conducting research for my undergrad thesis:

“I wanted to model because I thought I was, at least superficially, proving to myself and others that I was beautiful.”

Sometimes the truth isn’t so pretty.

But that comfort I took in the industry when I was young was not there nearly as much a decade later. Age and other experiences brought with them greater self-esteem and confidence in myself. Aside from being mildly comforted by being around other young women with similar heights and sizes as myself, I didn’t feel a sense of belonging and I didn’t feel like I fit in anymore. In fact, I started to feel uncomfortable. At a recent audition, myself and three other models auditioned in a group. We each were to say our names, ages, and then walk for the clients: “15.” “15.” “14.” “26.” One of these things is not like the others.

All in all, modelling wasn’t making me happy. And it is this that became my main reason for “retiring” from it. Unlike a lot of other careers, where if you work hard you have a chance at getting ahead, this is not necessarily the case for models. Your career is mostly in the hands of the decision makers: agents, photographers, designers, and other clients. Of course, you have to take good care of your appearance, can improve on things like your walk and ability to pose for the camera, and be a consummate professional. These things might be necessary, but they certainly are not sufficient. Furthermore, your ”look”, and whether those physical traits you possess are “in” in the modelling industry exactly when you enter it, are just luck of the draw.

This lack of personal control over my work, not fitting in, and not feeling a sense of personal or professional growth have been making me unhappy. It turns out that I’m not the only one who feels this way. A week or so after I had notified everyone I needed to about my decision, I came across this academic study, which suggests that models are less happy than non-models of similar ages because the modelling profession does not satisfy basic psychological needs for happiness and well-being such as competence, forming deep relationships, exercising personal control, and being valued for things like skill and intelligence.

This isn’t to say that I didn’t find positive aspects to the industry - in fact, I found many. Modelling has led me to meet some really interesting, kind, intelligent people like Danielle Meder and Dan Grant, just to name a couple. And there are a heck of a lot of wonderful young women working as models who do not fit the negative stereotypes they are often labelled with. Modelling has also helped me to learn a lot about myself, my interests, my motivations, and goals. I have thicker skin and can better handle rejection. It has helped me to learn how to look my best and broadened my definition and understanding of beauty. I’ve also learned that models can claim some pretty outrageous items as expenses on their tax returns.

Sometimes I’m angry at myself because I worry I made the wrong decision – wasting two years to go back to modelling when I could have spent that time building a more sustainable, future-oriented career. But I don’t think it was a mistake. It gave me a break from school and enabled me to fully engage in trying to achieve this goal. I leave it behind with full confidence that it is time to put it in the past and move on. Perhaps it was more of an exercise in preventing regret than anything else, but getting to move forward without wondering if modelling ever would have worked out for me, is satisfying and calming in its own way.

Having been in the industry, and now being outside of the industry, will enable me to better communicate my views and thoughts about it, and bring a better, more balanced perspective to my writing and research. I’m confident in my decision. My mind feels very liberated to be free from it, allowing me to begin planning out my next career move.

There are models-turned-actors, models-turned-designers, and models-turned-entrepreneurs. For now, I guess that I am a model-turned-nothing. But, most of us have stages of searching and self-discovery in our lives. I’m okay with this.

This is, in part, why there has been a hiatus in my blogging. I needed to set everything aside and do a lot of thinking and planning about my future. To my readers, I’m sorry for not posting for so long but thank you for your patience. And to those who encouraged me to keep blogging and expressed that they missed it - you are so sweet. Thank you for the push I needed to get back to it.

{ 5 comments }

Beautiful and Fashionable Quotes: Audrey Hepburn

by Jennifer McWhirter on March 21, 2009

“I never thought I’d land in pictures with a face like mine.”
Audrey Hepburn

{ 1 comment }

Beauty 101: Generalized Halo Effect

by Jennifer McWhirter on March 21, 2009

Welcome to Beauty 101, where I’ll introduce you to terminology, facts, concepts, ideas, and theories related to beauty. Some posts in this category will be introductory; others, more in-depth.

GENERALIZED HALO EFFECT

The generalized halo effect, refers to the phenomenon whereby those who are partners of the very attractive get to share in the benefits of the halo effect. With the generalized halo effect, people attribute positive characteristics to the partners of the very good-looking (and not just the very good-looking individual).  For example, in “The Bubble” episode of 30 Rock I wrote about earlier, Liz Lemon could have stayed in the Bubble with her boyfriend, Drew, where she could have benefited from his attractiveness.

Most often though, the generalized halo effect is reserved for not-so-good-looking men who are the partners of gorgeous women — people assume the man must be smart, powerful, and wealthy because of his partner’s attractiveness.

{ 1 comment }

The Bubble: Halo Effect on 30 Rock

by Jennifer McWhirter on March 21, 2009

If you tuned into 30 Rock on Thursday night, you witnessed the halo effect in all its glory and hilarity.

The episode, called The Bubble, showed Liz Lemon’s (Tina Fey) boyfriend, Dr. Drew Baird (Jon Hamm), getting special treatment because he is good-looking. Through a montage of scenes, it becomes obvious that Drew is not very good at a lot of things (cooking, sex, tennis, etc.) but because he is so attractive he has been living his whole life in a “Bubble” where people don’t tell him the truth about his short-comings. In this Bubble, he gets complimented on the street, teaches a sport he cannot play, gets out of a parking ticket, and thinks orange Gatorade tastes good on salmon.

Jack (Alec Baldwin) has to explain to Liz what the Bubble is: a place where good-looking people live and no one tells them the truth — “a danger of being super-handsome”. He shares with her a photo of him at 25, with a Superman chest and piercing blue eyes, when he himself lived in the Bubble. He says, “I’ve got to get back in the bubble.”

Liz eventually feels compelled to tell Drew that he lives differently than most people because of his attractiveness. Drew doesn’t like reality outside and wants to stay in the Bubble and have Liz there with him. She says she can’t and tells him the relationship won’t work out. He drives off (barely) on his new motorcycle.

Two beauty phenomena occur in this episode. The first is obvious — the halo effect — which I introduced you to last week in Beauty 101. The second, the generalized halo effect, I explain in the second installment of Beauty 101.

{ 1 comment }

Beauty 101: Halo Effect

by Jennifer McWhirter on March 12, 2009

Welcome to Beauty 101, where I’ll introduce you to terminology, facts, concepts, ideas, and theories related to beauty. Some posts in this category will be introductory; others, more in-depth.

HALO EFFECT

The Halo Effect (Beauty Halo Effect or Attractiveness Halo Effect) refers to a cognitive bias whereby attractive people are viewed to have more desirable personalities, skills, and traits compared to less attractive people. People assume that if an individual is good looking, they must be good in other ways, too. For example, good looking people are thought to be more intelligent and popular, and are more likely to get away with committing a serious crime compared to those who are unattractive.

This, of course, doesn’t explain the “dumb blonde” stereotype, but that’s for another post…

{ 2 comments }